There have been suggestions that the federal government add incentives for whistleblowers in a number of areas since the passage of Dodd-Frank. One area where I have not seen as much support as I would expect is for the payment of incentives to environmental whistleblowers.
We’re on the verge of the largest fine in history for the violation of the Clean Water Act. If there was a time to push for it, now would be the time. BP is facing a potential fine of up to $13.7 billion for violations of the Clean Water Act for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010. Transocean already paid $1.4 billion to settle civil and criminal charges related to its role in the spill.
Calls for reform of whistleblower procedures in the securities industry gained momentum because of the unsuccessful efforts of a hedge fund manager to expose the fraud on investors perpetuated by Bernie Madoff. The BP disaster, similarly, might have been prevented if complaints about the testing of blowout preventers at BP had been encouraged and heeded.
The Potential BP Whistleblower
An industry veteran accused BP of falsifying reports of blowout preventers passing state performance tests in Alaska. The accusations led to his testimony in a 2003 lawsuit. Alaska investigated but did not take action against the company. It only prosecuted one individual, a low level employee.
The BP spill has been blamed in part on problems with the blowout preventer at the Gulf of Mexico rig. Would additional government scrutiny have led to changes company-wide at BP? Would the government inspection of this aspect of the oil rig been more stringent after receiving a whistleblower report?
It is impossible to know what would have happened in this case. Still, there could easily be other looming environmental problems that could be prevented if the EPA gave employees of the company an incentive to come forward.
The Other Environmental Pollution Trial
BP may be garnering all of the headlines, but it isn’t the only environmental trial happening right now. Dupont is currently facing a trial in a lawsuit under the False Claims Act for failure to report the release of cancer-causing gas at a plant in Louisiana. The lawsuit, brought by a whistleblower, is based on the company’s failure to report the release under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Environmental lawsuits are only a small part of the False Claims Act. More typically, FCA lawsuits have been brought in cases where contractors are paid to cleanup environmental disasters and do not perform the work or overcharge for it.
As it is interpreted by the courts, though, it is no substitute for an EPA whistleblower program.
Why aren’t There Calls for Reform??
The government uses rewards in other areas to encourage insiders and other individuals to bring misconduct to light. After large oil spills, the need for a government investigation is clear. So it isn’t an area where the government necessarily needs someone to come forward in order to spur an investigation. The government may be concerned that parasitic tips will be provided that don’t substantially aid the investigation.
On the other hand, EPA enforcement actions led to $163 million in fines and penalties last year and companies agreed to pay $9.7 billion to clean up contaminated sites and control pollution. Would the opportunity to prevent billions in environmental damage not be worth the rewards paid to individuals who helped stop them from continuing?
The EPA and Whistleblowers Now
The environmental laws and the EPA don’t totally ignore whistleblowers now. The EPA website already contains a page to allow for the reporting of environmental violations. The Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, CERCLA and RCRA contain protections for whistleblowers who experience retaliation.
The Clean Air Act even authorizes awards of up to $10,000 for information about violations of the law. Unfortunately, an investigation into this provision by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility last year turned up no evidence it has been used.
Are these measures enough? Have they been successful? It would be interesting to see a Governmental Accountability Office report in this area similar to the one done concerning antitrust whistleblowers.
Could it Work?
Corporations are no doubt committing violations of the nation’s environmental laws on a daily basis. Incentivizing whistleblowers have proven to be a cost effective tool to help the United States learn about violations of the fraud and securities laws. It could similarly help the EPA enforce U.S. laws against environmental pollution. The SEC and CFTC programs could prove a model for the EPA to implement.
Given the support among environmental groups for protection of the environment and major prosecutions of Kerr-McGee and BP, it’s surprising that there haven’t been more calls for expanded use of whistleblowers in this area. Let’s hope that this is an area that gains additional support. The enforcement of our environmental laws for clean air, water and soil is a worthy place to encourage people to tip off the government to misconduct.